Our process for evaluating governance proposals is designed to be thorough, collaborative, and transparent, ensuring well-informed decisions that align with the best interests of the project and its community. Our evaluation process consists of the following steps:
- Proposal introduced: The governance team conducts research on the subject matter. This involves reviewing the proposal's details, understanding its implications, and assessing its potential impact on the project and community.
- Discussion: Engage in open and candid discussions to share their comments, feedback, and concern on the proposal.
- External consultation (if needed): Our team may reach out to relevant parties such as the protocol team, other governance participants, or related organisations for additional information.
- Consensus: Each governance team member casts their vote on the proposal, with each member having equal voting power. The final decision is based on the majority vote.
- Communication and transparency: Once a decision has been reached, we clearly communicate our stance and voting rationale to the community. Transparency is very important, this foster trust and accountability with the community. We also share our stances on social media platforms to keep the wider community informed and engaged.
By following this systematic and collaborative approach, we ensure that our evaluation of governance proposals is well-rounded, informed, and aligned with the project's long-term success and the best interests of the community.